<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BOYCOTT SUNDANCE:  Day 2 &#8211; My favorite interaction on Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marmel.com/2009/08/boycott-sundance-day-2-my-favorite-interaction-on-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marmel.com/2009/08/boycott-sundance-day-2-my-favorite-interaction-on-facebook/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Green</title>
		<link>http://marmel.com/2009/08/boycott-sundance-day-2-my-favorite-interaction-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marmel.com/?p=1294#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Amen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Cook</title>
		<link>http://marmel.com/2009/08/boycott-sundance-day-2-my-favorite-interaction-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marmel.com/?p=1294#comment-782</guid>
		<description>The person who wrote &#8220;I&#8217;m not exactly sure how you can be black by choice, since that is also a protected class&quot; has a common misunderstanding of the term &quot;protected class&quot;. 
 
Black isn&#039;t a protected class.  The protected classes are race, religion, gender, etc.  It isn&#039;t any PARTICULAR race or gender that is protected by laws prohibiting discrimination.  The law is against discrimination based on race. 
 
This common confusion is often exploited by those arguing against any extension of basic human rights protections.  They say that nobody should be in any special protected class, as if there were some groups of people proteced while others are not.   
 
The use of the word class in this context isn&#039;t the same usage as middle class, working class, or upper class.  Rather, it is a classification, such as race, gender or religion.....merely the different classes of discrimination that are illegal. 
 
If the laws protected people differently, they would be unconstitutional, because we are all covered by equal protection under the law. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person who wrote &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not exactly sure how you can be black by choice, since that is also a protected class&quot; has a common misunderstanding of the term &quot;protected class&quot;. </p>
<p>Black isn&#039;t a protected class.  The protected classes are race, religion, gender, etc.  It isn&#039;t any PARTICULAR race or gender that is protected by laws prohibiting discrimination.  The law is against discrimination based on race. </p>
<p>This common confusion is often exploited by those arguing against any extension of basic human rights protections.  They say that nobody should be in any special protected class, as if there were some groups of people proteced while others are not.   </p>
<p>The use of the word class in this context isn&#039;t the same usage as middle class, working class, or upper class.  Rather, it is a classification, such as race, gender or religion&#8230;..merely the different classes of discrimination that are illegal. </p>
<p>If the laws protected people differently, they would be unconstitutional, because we are all covered by equal protection under the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeirdArchives</title>
		<link>http://marmel.com/2009/08/boycott-sundance-day-2-my-favorite-interaction-on-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>WeirdArchives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marmel.com/?p=1294#comment-776</guid>
		<description>Very true. If a state wants to fire someone because of their sexual preference, then that state should suffer the consequences. This kind of shit shouldn&#039;t be tolerated anymore, especially with so much blood shed in dealing with such bigotry. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. If a state wants to fire someone because of their sexual preference, then that state should suffer the consequences. This kind of shit shouldn&#039;t be tolerated anymore, especially with so much blood shed in dealing with such bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
